Case Brief - Tarasoff v Regents of UC

T​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​his case brief is part of a group project case "Tarasoff v Regents of UC" (attached) and I need to create 2 parts "Legal Principals Applied" and "Reasoning". Pls, see below for more details on both parts and the attachment for the sample/example from another project. ------------------------------- Legal Principle Applied: This is the rule of law that the court applies to determine the substantive rights of the parties. The rule of law could derive from a statute, case rule, regulation, or may be a synthesis ​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​of prior holdings in similar cases (common law). The rule or legal principle may be expressly stated in the opinion or it may be implied. --------------------------- Reasoning: This is the court’s analysis of the issues and the heart of the case brief. Reasoning is the way in which the court applied the rules/ legal principles to the particular facts in the case to reach its decision. This includes syllogistic application of rules as well as policy arguments the court used to justify its holding (why the decision was socially desirabl​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​e).