Brittany Maynard and Maggie Karner are both suffering from the same terminal form of cancer, but hold very different perspectives on dying with dignity.
Brittany Maynard's Perspective
Brittany's choice: 29-year-old reignites debate about aid in dying (7:27)
Brittany Maynard Takes Medicine To End Life | NBC Nightly News (3:04)
Brittany Maynard's Legacy: One Year Later (6:21)
Maggie Karner's Perspective
A Letter to Brittany Maynard (Maggie Karner is in the same situation with an opposite viewpoint) 5:58
Maggie Karner's Story (3:14)
Maggie Karner - End of Life - State Assisted Suicide (3:02)
What were your overall thoughts on euthanasia before watching these videos? Did your thoughts change after watching these videos? If so, how?
Brittany refers to euthanasia as a "healthcare choice"; Maggie calls it "state-assisted suicide." What are your thoughts on this?
Maggie and Brittany both addressed the notion of "selfishness" in their stories. What role do you think selfishness plays in the question of euthanasia?
Which perspective do you agree with more - Maggie's or Brittany's? Or, a combination of both? Explain
Do you think that it should be legal to take your own life if diagnosed with a terminal illness?
What are the pros and cons of legalizing the "right to die"?
Full Answer Section
Shifting Perspectives?
The videos can challenge or reinforce pre-existing views. Brittany's story showcases the desire for control and dignity in the face of a terminal illness. Maggie's perspective emphasizes the value of life and the potential for unexpected blessings even in hardship.
"Healthcare Choice" vs. "State-Assisted Suicide":
- Brittany's view ("Healthcare Choice") frames euthanasia as a medical decision, similar to choosing pain management options. This emphasizes individual autonomy and control over the end-of-life process.
- Maggie's view ("State-Assisted Suicide") highlights the legal and ethical implications. It emphasizes the potential for abuse and the role of the state in safeguarding life.
"Selfishness" in Euthanasia:
- Brittany: She avoids the term "selfish," arguing her choice allows her to protect loved ones from emotional burden.
- Maggie: She believes choosing death can be a burden on loved ones who may feel obligated to fulfill the wish.
Whose Perspective?
There's no right or wrong answer.
- Brittany's view: Resonates with those who prioritize individual choice and control over their final days.
- Maggie's view: Speaks to those who value life's sanctity and the importance of support systems.
Legality of Euthanasia:
The legal landscape of euthanasia varies. This activity doesn't take a stance on its legality, but explores the arguments:
- Pros: Individual autonomy, control over suffering, potential to reduce pain and fear at the end of life.
- Cons: Potential for abuse, risk of coercion, ethical concerns about the role of medicine in ending a life.
Conclusion:
Euthanasia is a complex issue with no easy answers. Brittany and Maggie's stories offer valuable insights for navigating this sensitive topic. Ultimately, the decision of how to approach the end of life is a deeply personal one.
Sample Answer
Euthanasia: Examining Two Stories, Two Perspectives
The stories of Brittany Maynard and Maggie Karner offer a powerful exploration of the complex issue of euthanasia, also known as physician-assisted suicide.
Before the Videos:
Many people have initial opinions on euthanasia, ranging from strong support for individual choice to complete opposition.