PerfectCustomPapers | Bidding For International Sporting Event

Bidding For International Sporting Event

Being selected to a national team is a great honor. National team members are invited and expected to represent their country in international competition. Because major international events do not always provide prize money or appearance fees, some athletes would rather attend a competition that pays for them for their work. Should athletes represent their country in competition for no money when compensation is available at a competition conducted elsewhere at the same time? Why or why not? (approximately 2 – 3 paragraphs is sufficient).
If a city is bidding to host the Olympic Games, what factors does the organizing committee need to consider when considering to bid for the Olympics? (approximately 2 – 3 paragraphs is sufficient).
In your own words (approximately 2 – 3 paragraphs) discuss some instances of corruption for major sporting events such as the FIFA World Cup, or many sports organizations, like the USOPC. Discuss why the corruption occurred and what could be done from a sport governance standpoint to prevent future corruption.
In your own words (approximately 2 – 3 paragraphs) explain what “Sport For All” means. “Sport For All” is. How does this relate to sport governance?

Sample Answer

Representing Nation vs. Personal Gain: A Balancing Act

Whether athletes should prioritize representing their country without pay when a financially rewarding competition coincides depends on individual perspectives and values. Some athletes prioritize national pride and the honor of representing their country on the world stage, finding fulfillment in intangibles like patriotism and contributing to national success. Others, especially those facing financial difficulties or supporting families, might prioritize earning potential to secure their futures. Ultimately, the decision lies with each individual athlete, considering their personal circumstances, values, and career goals.

Full Answer Section

Bidding for the Olympics: A Careful Consideration

Cities considering an Olympic bid face a multifaceted decision. On the positive side, hosting the Games can boost tourism, infrastructure development, and national prestige. However, the costs are immense, encompassing venue construction, athlete accommodation, security, and logistics. Organizing committees must consider these financial burdens, long-term sustainability, and potential debt alongside potential benefits before bidding. Public support, existing infrastructure, and post-Games utilization plans are crucial factors for a successful bid and responsible hosting.

Corruption in Sports: A Persistent Challenge

Corruption scandals like the FIFA World Cup bribery case highlight the vulnerabilities of major sporting events. Greed, lack of transparency, and weak governance structures create fertile ground for unethical practices. To combat this, stricter regulations, independent oversight bodies, and robust whistleblowing mechanisms are essential. Holding officials accountable, increasing financial transparency, and promoting ethical leadership within sports organizations are crucial steps towards safeguarding the integrity of sports.

Sport for All: Inclusion and Opportunity

“Sport for All” embodies the principle that everyone, regardless of ability, background, or circumstance, should have the opportunity to participate in and enjoy sports. This philosophy aligns with good sport governance by promoting inclusivity, accessibility, and equal opportunities for all. By removing barriers to participation, such as cost, infrastructure, or discrimination, sport governing bodies can foster physical and mental well-being, social cohesion, and community development through sport. By embracing “Sport for All,” sport governance moves beyond elite competition and embraces the transformative power of sport for individuals and society as a whole.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

No More Worries!

Paper Formatting

No Lateness!

Our Guarantees