Here again is the Basic Problem of Evil:
- If God is omnipotent, then God is able to prevent evil
- If God is omnibenevolent, then God wants to prevent evil
- If God is omniscient, then God knows how to prevent evil.
- If a 3 "O" God exists, there is no evil.
- There is evil.
- Thus, a 3 "O" God does not exist.
Is this argument persuasive? Why or why? Be clear and precise in your comments (e.g. stating which step of the argument you are challenging or defending), and most importantly, be respectful and civil in your exchanges with others. Religion can be a sensitive topic for many people!
Full Answer Section
Weaknesses of the Argument:
- Definitions of Evil: What constitutes "evil" can be subjective. Is it just physical suffering, or does it encompass moral wrongs as well? The argument doesn't delve into the nuances of defining evil.
- Free Will: Many religious traditions posit free will as a gift from God. However, free will allows humans to make choices, even bad ones, which can have negative consequences. The argument doesn't account for the possibility that God allows evil to coexist with free will.
- Mystery of God's Plan: The argument assumes we can fully understand God's motives and actions. Some argue that God's ways are beyond human comprehension, and suffering may serve a purpose beyond our understanding.
Alternative Perspectives:
- Greater Good Argument: Some argue that God allows evil for a greater good, even if we can't perceive it. For instance, suffering may build character or lead to acts of compassion.
- Soul-Making Theodicy: This concept suggests that suffering is necessary for spiritual growth and development of the soul.
Conclusion:
The Problem of Evil is a complex issue with no easy answers. The argument presented is thought-provoking, but it may not be definitively persuasive for everyone. Ultimately, the question of reconciling evil with the existence of God is a matter of personal belief and interpretation.
Sample Answer
The argument you've presented, the Problem of Evil, is a classic challenge in philosophy of religion. Its persuasiveness depends on how you define the terms and how well the premises hold up. Here's a breakdown:
Strengths of the Argument:
- It raises a valid question: If an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God exists, why does evil persist?
- It forces us to grapple with the complexities of God's nature and reconcile it with the reality of suffering.