An ethical dilemma is a situation where a person faces a difficult choice between two or more conflicting ethical principles or values
- · Use of Force: Officers must decide whether to use force in a high-stakes situation. The dilemma is balancing the need to protect public safety and themselves against the potential harm to the individual involved. Excessive force can lead to violations of human rights, while insufficient force can endanger lives.
Ethics are the standards of conduct of a particular profession or group. A dilemma is defined as a situation in which one must choose between difficult alternatives. In an ethical dilemma, choosing between alternatives is challenging because ethical standards may be in conflict. Either choice may uphold one ethical standard but, at the same time, violate another. There may not be a clear cut way to choose between right and wrong.
Examples of a few ethical standards include:
Journalists protect the identity of their sources and also avoid receiving money or other favors from those about whom they write.
Health care professionals maintain patient confidentiality and also report public health hazards to government authorities.
Mortgage lenders pledge to advise clients of all costs.
Career counselors strive to avoid imposing their personal values or biases on those whom they advise.
Audience: The report should be geared for a lay audience (an audience who is not familiar with the field). In the workplace, reports may be read by multiple readers who have different levels of technical knowledge. However, because your instructor is not necessarily familiar with your field (a lay reader), you will need to define discipline-specific terminology and jargon and provide more background about the issue.
Content: Your report should contain the following information:
Summary of the ethical dilemma or controversy
A discussion of the ethical issues relating to the dilemma
A comparison of the different options for solving the dilemma
A proposed solution containing your personal perspective
Ethical dilemmas and controversies are not always easily resolved. This research is designed to help you examine and analyze a controversy in your career field.
Full Answer Section
Proposed Solution:
A comprehensive solution involves a combination of these approaches. Stricter policies, enhanced training, and body cameras can provide a framework for ethical decision-making and accountability. However, it's equally important to address the underlying social issues that contribute to police-community tensions, such as poverty, discrimination, and lack of access to mental health services.
Personal Perspective:
The use of force is a complex and challenging issue that requires careful consideration of all factors involved. I believe a balanced approach that emphasizes de-escalation, accountability, and community engagement is essential to ensure the safety and well-being of both officers and the public.
Sample Answer
The Ethical Dilemma of Use of Force in Law Enforcement
Law enforcement officers often face incredibly difficult situations that require split-second decisions. One such dilemma is the use of force. It's a complex issue that involves balancing the need to protect public safety and officer safety with the potential harm to individuals involved.
The Ethical Quandary:
The core ethical dilemma lies in the conflict between two important principles:
-
Public Safety: Officers have a duty to protect the public from harm, even if it means using force to apprehend suspects or to intervene in dangerous situations.
-
Individual Rights: Every person has fundamental rights, including the right to be free from excessive force and the right to due process.
The Ethical Issues:
Several ethical issues arise when considering the use of force:
-
Proportionality: The use of force must be proportionate to the threat posed. This means officers should use the least amount of force necessary to achieve their objectives.
-
De-escalation: Officers should strive to de-escalate situations whenever possible, using communication and other non-forceful techniques to resolve conflicts peacefully.
-
Bias and Discrimination: Officers should be mindful of potential biases and ensure that their use of force is not influenced by factors like race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status.
-
Accountability: Officers must be held accountable for their actions, and any use of force should be thoroughly investigated to ensure it was justified and proportionate.
Options for Resolution:
There are various approaches to addressing this dilemma:
-
Stricter Policies: Implementing stricter policies on the use of force, including clear guidelines for when force is justified and detailed reporting requirements.
-
Enhanced Training: Providing officers with comprehensive training on de-escalation techniques, cultural sensitivity, and ethical decision-making.
-
Body Cameras: Widespread use of body cameras can provide objective evidence of incidents involving the use of force, promoting transparency and accountability.
-
Community Engagement: Building trust and relationships with the community can help address potential biases and foster a more collaborative approach to policing.