An argument against veganism

  1. What is you responds to Greenfields argument? How convincing a case does he make that there are valid
    arguments against veganism even though he is a committed vegan?
  2. How would you characterize Greenfields audiences in this blog posting? in other words, which group(s)
    would constitute his intended or ideal readers, his invoked readers, and his real readers? Cite specific
    evidence from the text – anything from word of choice to kind of appeals to evidence offered – for the first two of
    these categories.

find the cost of your paper