Advice on the financial position of two companies

You have been asked by a client to advice on the financial position of two companies in a similar trade sector. You have been supplied with the following financial statements.

Income Statement for the year ended 31 March 2016

    Nixon Ltd   Zip Ltd
Notes   £000    £000

Revenue 638 493
Cost of sales (331) (297)
–––––– ––––––
Gross profit 307 196
Distribution costs (36) (29)
Administrative expenses 1 (99) (46)
–––––– ––––––
Profit before taxation 172 121
Taxation (21) (22)
–––––– ––––––
Profit for the year 151 99
====== ======

Statement of financial position as at 31 March 2016
Notes Nixon Ltd Zip Ltd

Non‐current assets (NBV): £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000

Property, plant and equipment 1 198 111
Current assets:
Inventory 60 58
Trade and other receivables 35 43
Cash and cash equivalents 2 –
–––– 97 –––– 101
–––– ––––
Total assets 295 212
Equity and liabilities: ==== ====

Share capital (£1 share each) 50 30
Retained earnings 161 66
–––– ––––
Non‐current liabilities: 211 96

Borrowings – 20
Current liabilities:
Trade and other payables 2 74 74
Current tax payable 10 12
Bank overdraft – 10
–––– 84 –––– 96
–––– 84 –––– 116
–––– ––––
Total equity and liabilities 295 212
==== ====

Notes to the financial statements:

  1. The non‐current assets held by the companies are as follows: Nixon Ltd Zip Ltd
    £000 £000
    Land and buildings 97 43
    Fixtures and fittings 28 17
    Motor vehicles 73 51
    –––– ––––
    198 111 –––– ––––
  2. Trade and other payables for both companies include a proposed dividend. Nixon Ltd has proposed a dividend of £50,000 and Zip Ltd a dividend of £40,000.

Required:

a. Calculate all the appropriate ratios (at least 2 from each group) and critically appraise the current financial position of each of the two companies. (40 marks)

b. Define working capital cycle and calculate the working capital cycle of both companies and discuss how a company can improve the working capital cycle? (30 marks)

c. What are the limitations of ratio analysis technique? Discuss in details. (30 marks)

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

Financial Analysis of Nixon Ltd. and Zip Ltd.

a. Ratio Analysis and Financial Position:

Profitability Ratios:

Ratio Nixon Ltd. Zip Ltd. Interpretation
Profit margin 23.7% 20.1% Nixon Ltd. has a slightly higher profit margin, indicating better efficiency in converting revenue to profit.
Return on equity (ROE) 94.2% 150.0% Zip Ltd. has a significantly higher ROE, indicating it generates more profit per unit of shareholder equity.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

Liquidity Ratios:

Ratio Nixon Ltd. Zip Ltd. Interpretation
Current ratio 1.15 1.05 Both companies have current ratios slightly above 1, indicating they have enough current assets to cover current liabilities in the short term.
Acid-test ratio 0.65 0.49 Nixon Ltd. has a better acid-test ratio, indicating they have more immediate liquidity after considering inventory.

Solvency Ratios:

Ratio Nixon Ltd. Zip Ltd. Interpretation
Debt-to-equity ratio 0.00 0.30 Nixon Ltd. has no debt, while Zip Ltd. has some debt, but the ratio is still reasonable, suggesting manageable financial risk.

Appraisal:

  • Nixon Ltd.: Strong profitability, no debt, but lower ROE and liquidity compared to Zip Ltd. They should focus on improving working capital management and dividend distribution.
  • Zip Ltd.: Highest ROE, but slightly lower profitability and weaker liquidity compared to Nixon Ltd. They need to balance growth with maintaining financial stability.

b. Working Capital Cycle and Improvement:

Calculation:

  • Inventory turnover days = 365 days / Inventory turnover (sales / average inventory)
  • Receivables turnover days = 365 days / Receivables turnover (sales / average receivables)
  • Payables turnover days = 365 days / Payables turnover (cost of goods sold / average payables)
  • Working capital cycle = Inventory turnover days + Receivables turnover days – Payables turnover days

Improvement Strategies:

  • Reduce inventory levels: Implement lean manufacturing, negotiate better terms with suppliers, improve inventory forecasting.
  • Collect receivables faster: Offer discounts for early payments, implement stricter credit control policies.
  • Extend payables terms: Negotiate longer payment terms with suppliers.

c. Limitations of Ratio Analysis:

  • Historical data: Ratios represent past performance and might not predict future trends.
  • Industry comparisons: Benchmarking against inappropriate industries can be misleading.
  • Manipulation: Companies can use accounting practices to influence ratios.
  • Oversimplification: Ratios alone don’t provide a complete picture of a company’s financial health.

Additional Notes:

  • Consider qualitative factors like management experience, market position, and competitive landscape for a more complete analysis.
  • Ratio analysis should be used in conjunction with other financial statement analysis techniques.

Remember, this analysis is based on the provided information and may not be exhaustive. Always consult with a financial professional for specific investment advice.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer