How does Nagel explore the so-called absurdity of human existence? Why does
Nagel criticize Camus’ responses to the phenomenon of absurdity? Making sure to
explain what Nagel means by self-fulfillment, how does he think it helps to get
around the notion of meaninglessness? How can self-fulfillment be attained to a
greater degree in Nagel’s estimation? How can self-fulfillment be squandered?
Can self-fulfillment make life worth living even in the face of absurdity (as Nagel
contends)? Why or why not?