No More Worries!

Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

Double or single-spaced
1-inch margin
12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
300 words per page

No Lateness!

Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

Free Unlimited revisions
Guaranteed Privacy
Money Return guarantee
Plagiarism Free Writing

A serial murderer or a policy.

select only one (1) topic: a serial murderer or a policy.
• If you select a serial murderer, you will write a 3–4-page biography of the individual followed by an 11-14 page analysis of at least 3 theories that might be used to explain why the individual committed the crimes they committed. Each theory must be explained in reference to the individual’s biography and must be greatly detailed.
• If you select a current criminal justice policy (i.e., three-strikes laws), you will write a 3–4-page description of the policy followed by an 11-14 page analysis of at least 3 theories that might have been used as a foundation for that policy. Each theory must be explained in reference to the individual’s biography and must be greatly detailed

Full Answer Section

Theoretical Foundations

Deterrence Theory: Proponents of the three-strikes law often argue that it serves as a deterrent, discouraging individuals from committing additional crimes due to the fear of severe punishment. The assumption is that potential offenders will weigh the costs and benefits of criminal activity and choose to abstain.
Incapacitation Theory: This perspective emphasizes the need to remove dangerous offenders from society to protect the public. By imposing lengthy prison sentences on repeat offenders, the three-strikes law aims to incapacitate individuals who pose a significant risk to public safety.
Retributivism: Some supporters of the three-strikes law view it as a form of just deserts. The idea is that offenders should be punished in proportion to the severity of their crimes, and repeat offenders deserve harsher penalties.

Policy Analysis and Implications

While the three-strikes law has garnered support for its potential to reduce crime rates, it has also faced criticism. Studies have shown mixed results regarding its effectiveness as a deterrent, and concerns have been raised about its disproportionate impact on certain populations, such as minorities and those from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Additionally, the policy has led to increased prison populations and associated costs. Some argue that alternative sentencing options, such as rehabilitation programs, might be more effective in reducing recidivism and promoting public safety.

Conclusion

The three-strikes law is a complex policy with both supporters and critics. While it has been implemented with the goal of deterring crime and protecting the public, its effectiveness and unintended consequences warrant further examination. A more nuanced approach that considers factors such as the nature of the crime, the offender's criminal history, and the potential for rehabilitation may be necessary to achieve the desired outcomes.

Sample Answer

Topic: The Three-Strikes Law

Policy Description

The three-strikes law is a criminal justice policy that mandates significantly harsher penalties for individuals convicted of multiple felonies. The exact implementation varies by jurisdiction, but the core principle is that after two felony convictions, a third results in a mandatory extended prison sentence, often life imprisonment. This policy emerged in the 1990s as part of a broader "tough on crime" movement.