Historical research studies that were found to be unethical

What are two historical research studies that were found to be unethical?

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

1. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972):

  • The Study: This study, conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service, followed 600 Black men in Alabama, of whom 399 had syphilis. Participants were told they were receiving free healthcare, but they were actually denied treatment even after penicillin became the standard cure for syphilis in the 1940s. The study continued for 40 years, leading to the deaths of many participants, severe health consequences, and the spread of syphilis to their families.

  • Ethical Violations:

    • Lack of informed consent: Participants were not fully informed about the study’s true nature or the risks involved.

    • Deception and manipulation: Participants were misled about the nature of the study and the treatments they were receiving.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

2. The Willowbrook Hepatitis Study (1956-1972):

  • The Study: Conducted at Willowbrook State School, a New York institution for children with intellectual disabilities, this study intentionally infected children with hepatitis to study the effects of the disease and the efficacy of gamma globulin.

  • Ethical Violations:

    • Lack of informed consent: Parents were coerced into enrolling their children, often under the pretense that participation was necessary for admission to the institution.

    • Infliction of harm: Children were deliberately infected with a potentially dangerous disease without their consent.

    • Exploitation of vulnerable individuals: The study targeted a population that was unable to provide informed consent and was dependent on the institution for care.

These studies are considered egregious examples of unethical research practices. They highlight the importance of informed consent, the need to protect vulnerable populations, and the ethical responsibilities of researchers to prioritize the well-being of their participants. These cases led to significant reforms in research ethics and continue to serve as cautionary tales for researchers today.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer