Full Answer Section

Limitation:

• Potential for Overcomplication: Integrating two different theoretical frameworks can be complex. The colleague might struggle to find a way to seamlessly blend the individual and structural aspects when formulating interventions.

There’s a risk of interventions focusing heavily on one theory at a time, neglecting the interplay between the individual and the social structures. Additionally, the client might find it confusing to navigate interventions that address both their mindset and external challenges.

Here are some suggestions to help your colleague overcome this limitation:

• Focus on common ground: Look for areas where the two theories intersect. For example, both might emphasize the importance of empowerment for the client.
• Prioritize: Depending on the client’s specific situation, one theory might be more relevant initially. The colleague can prioritize interventions based on the most pressing needs while keeping the bigger picture in mind.
• Client Collaboration: Involve the client in the intervention planning process. Discuss the different theoretical lenses and work together to find a solution that feels empowering and addresses both internal and external factors.

By acknowledging both strengths and limitations, your colleague can leverage the combined power of individual-related and structural/cultural-related theories to develop effective interventions for marginalized clients.