Passive and active design of a domestic building

Knowing what you now know to date about passive solar design features and active
measures, select an existing family dwelling as the starting point of this assignment. For an
existing building evaluate its current low energy design features and propose potential retrofit
energy efficiency measures. You may choose your own house as a reference. If you feel that
your own house is not the most suitable building, you may select a building other than your
own house so long as it is of a domestic scale. Quantify your savings and present a costbenefit analysis. Your
coursework should consider the following points.
a) Appraisal of the building (type of the building, site map of the location, latitude,
relevant topographical features location etc.)
b) Assess existing passive design features of the building such as insulation, glazing,
daylighting, passive heating or cooling etc. and identify the areas that have the
potential for further improvement.
c) Propose at least one passive and one active measure suitable for the building that
can be incorporated into the building to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy
consumption. Provide technical justification for their selections.
d) Extent and value of energy substitution. How much of the auxiliary heating/lighting
loads were met/offset by energy efficiency, passive or active measures?
e) Quantify energy and carbon savings and present a cost-benefit analysis for the
energy efficiency measures.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

Energy Efficiency Analysis of a Single-Family Home (Sample)

a) Building Appraisal

Building Type: Single-story ranch style home (1800 sq ft) Location: Austin, Texas (Latitude: 30.27° N) Site Map: The house sits on a flat lot with mature trees on the south and west sides.

b) Existing Passive Design Features:

  • Insulation: Moderate insulation (R-13) in attic and walls.
  • Glazing: Double-pane windows with aluminum frames (moderate thermal performance).

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

  • Daylighting: South-facing windows provide some natural light.
  • Passive Heating: Limited passive heating potential due to minimal south-facing glazing and potential shading by trees.
  • Passive Cooling: Overhangs exist above south-facing windows, potentially providing some shade during summer months.

Areas for Improvement:

  • Insulation: Upgrading attic and wall insulation can significantly reduce heating and cooling loads.
  • Glazing: Replacing windows with high-performance, double-paned windows with low-e coatings can improve thermal performance.
  • Daylighting: Strategically placed skylights or strategically sized windows on the north side can introduce more natural light, reducing reliance on artificial lighting.
  • Passive Heating: South-facing windows with thermal mass elements like dark tile flooring can capture solar heat in the winter.

c) Proposed Energy Efficiency Measures:

  1. Passive Measure: Attic Insulation Upgrade
  • Technical Justification: Adding insulation to the attic is one of the most cost-effective ways to reduce heat transfer. Upgrading from R-13 to R-38 insulation in the Texas climate can significantly reduce heating and cooling costs.
  1. Active Measure: Smart Thermostat
  • Technical Justification: A smart thermostat allows for programmable temperature control, reducing energy consumption during unoccupied periods. Smart thermostats can also learn user habits and optimize heating/cooling schedules.

d) Extent and Value of Energy Substitution

Estimated Savings:

  • Attic Insulation Upgrade (R-13 to R-38): 15-20% reduction in heating and cooling costs (Source: Department of Energy)
  • Smart Thermostat: Up to 10% reduction in heating and cooling costs (Source: Energy Star)

Combined Potential Savings: 25-30% reduction in annual energy consumption for heating and cooling.

e) Quantify Energy and Carbon Savings, Cost-Benefit Analysis

Energy Savings:

Assuming an annual energy bill of $2,000 for heating and cooling, potential savings could be:

  • $500 – $600 per year due to attic insulation upgrade.
  • $200 per year due to smart thermostat usage.

Carbon Savings:

Reduced energy consumption translates to lower carbon emissions from electricity generation. The exact amount would depend on the energy source mix in the local grid.

Cost-Benefit Analysis:

  • Attic Insulation Upgrade:

    • Cost: $1,500 – $2,000 (material and installation)
    • Payback Period: 3-5 years
  • Smart Thermostat:

    • Cost: $100 – $200
    • Payback Period: 1-2 years

Overall, the proposed measures offer significant energy and cost savings with relatively short payback periods. These improvements also contribute to a reduced carbon footprint.

Additional Notes:

  • This is a sample analysis, and actual costs and savings may vary depending on specific circumstances.
  • Conducting a home energy audit can provide a more detailed assessment of potential energy savings from various retrofit measures.
  • There might be financial incentives available from local governments or utility companies to encourage energy efficiency upgrades.

By implementing these and potentially other energy-efficient measures, the homeowner can create a more comfortable and sustainable living environment.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer