Ethics in influencing policy and politics

ethics in influencing policy and politics, please consider the section Allocation of Scarce Resources pgs. 116-119 in the book Policy & Politics in Nursing and Health Care 8th Edition. Include the following in your initial posting:

Consider the principles of distributive justice on page 116. What are some of the ethical issues that arise related to two of these principles? Name the principle and then discuss the ethical issue.
Answer the reflective question on page 117, regarding mental health impairments in a state without an outpatient treatment program as a member of the Emergency Nurses Association.

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

Policymakers constantly face the challenge of allocating scarce resources in healthcare, and ethical considerations play a crucial role in these decisions. Drawing on “Policy & Politics in Nursing and Health Care 8th Edition,” Let’s examine two key principles of distributive justice and their associated ethical issues:

1. The Utilitarian Principle: Maximize overall societal benefit.

Ethical Issue: Potential for discrimination: Balancing individual needs against broader societal benefit can lead to prioritizing majority groups or those deemed “more productive,” potentially neglecting vulnerable populations with complex needs. This raises concerns about fairness and equal access to care, especially for marginalized communities.

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

2. The Egalitarian Principle: Distribute resources equally among all individuals.

Ethical Issue: Ignoring individual needs and circumstances: Equal distribution might not account for varying needs and vulnerabilities. For example, someone with a chronic illness might require more resources than a healthy individual, highlighting the tension between pure equality and addressing specific needs.

Reflective Question:

“As a member of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA) in a state without an outpatient treatment program for individuals with mental health impairments, what actions would you take to advocate for policy change?”

My Response:

As an ENA member, witnessing the lack of outpatient treatment for mental health issues would necessitate immediate action. Here are some steps I would take:

  • Data Collection: Collaborate with ENA colleagues to gather data on the impact of this gap, including wait times, readmission rates, and strain on emergency departments. This data would serve as evidence for the need for change.
  • Raise Awareness: Partner with mental health organizations and patient advocacy groups to raise public awareness about the issue. Utilize ENA’s communication channels and media outreach to educate policymakers and the community.
  • Policy Engagement: Work with ENA to develop and advocate for legislation that establishes accessible and comprehensive outpatient mental health services. Lobby relevant policymakers, attend hearings, and organize grassroots efforts to build support.
  • Collaboration: Engage with other healthcare professionals, social workers, and community leaders to form a united front advocating for change. Leverage collective expertise and influence to increase the impact of advocacy efforts.
  • Direct Action: Organize peaceful protests, rallies, or letter-writing campaigns to garner public attention and pressure policymakers to act.

By taking these steps, I can utilize my position as an ENA member to advocate for ethical and equitable access to mental health care, addressing the gap in essential services and promoting the well-being of individuals and communities.

Remember, these are just initial considerations. Further exploration of specific policies, data analysis, and collaboration with diverse stakeholders is crucial for effective advocacy.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer