Legal and regulatory issues and risk management in the human services profession.

Evaluate legal and regulatory issues and risk management in the human services profession.

In the human services field, it is important to recognize situations that carry risks for both the client and the professional. Once identified, risk management techniques can be utilized to protect the client and the professional.

In this assignment, you will apply and evaluate the risk management techniques you have learned in a real-life scenario while evaluating legal and regulatory issues.

Assignment Scenario

Mr. Ashford is a caseworker at the county Human Services Department. One of his clients, Mr. Lainez, is a young man who presents with many issues. He has been in foster care and is about to age out of the program to live on his own. Mr. Ashford will be assisting him with this transition.

To connect with his young client, Mr. Ashford accepts Mr. Lainez’s invitation of friendship on social media. In addition, he provides his agency email address to Mr. Lainez when he asks if there is not another way to make an appointment rather than making a telephone call and going through a receptionist.

Shortly after that, Mr. Lainez experiences several disappointing events. He loses his job, and the young woman he is dating tells him she is no longer interested in seeing him. Additionally, he is struggling to make ends meet and becomes unable to pay the rent on his first apartment.

At his wits’ end, he makes a vague suicidal threat on Facebook and sends a desperate request to Mr. Ashford to set up an appointment as soon as possible. Out on calls, Mr. Ashford does not check his email or his Facebook account for several days, missing Mr. Lainez’s cues. His young client is found dead of an overdose of medication he has been prescribed by the department psychiatrist.

Assignment Directions

Use the readings, the internet, and the Purdue Global Library to research the implications of this case study under current law and practice expectations.

Please be sure to address all of the following in your assignment:

Introduce the case study and list each of the problematic decisions Mr. Ashford made in this scenario, analyzing each in terms of its effect on the outcome.
Identify and explain other choices he could or should have made.
Evaluate the legal and regulatory implications of this case study you learned from your research.
Apply and evaluate the risk management techniques you have learned to this case over the past two units.
Would they likely have led to a different outcome for Mr. Lainez? For Mr. Ashford? Why or why not?

find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

Introduction:

The scenario presents a tragic situation where Mr. Ashford’s decisions as a caseworker contributed to the unfortunate demise of his client, Mr. Lainez. This analysis will examine the problematic actions, explore alternative choices, assess legal and regulatory implications, and evaluate the impact of risk management techniques.

Problematic Decisions by Mr. Ashford:

  1. Friending Client on Social Media: This violates professional boundaries and ethical codes set by agencies and professional organizations like NASW. This action blurs the lines between professional and personal relationships, compromising objectivity and judgment.

Full Answer Section

 

 

  1. Sharing Personal Contact Information: Providing his agency email undermines communication protocols and opens the door for inappropriate communication outside official channels.

Alternative Choices:

  1. Maintain Professional Boundaries: Mr. Ashford should have declined the social media friend request and explained the importance of professional boundaries.
  2. Direct Client to Official Channels: He could have directed Mr. Lainez to schedule appointments through official channels, emphasizing confidentiality and proper communication procedures.
  3. Recognize and Respond to Red Flags: He should have noticed the vague suicidal threat on Facebook and immediately followed up through official channels, escalating the case if necessary.

Legal and Regulatory Implications:

Mr. Ashford’s actions could have legal and regulatory repercussions:

  • Breach of Ethical Codes: Violating ethical codes set by his agency and professional organizations could lead to disciplinary action, up to and including termination.
  • Negligence: Failure to follow procedures and uphold professional standards could lead to accusations of negligence, especially considering the tragic outcome.
  • HIPAA Violations: Sharing personal contact information potentially violates HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) if it contained health-related information.

Application of Risk Management Techniques:

Several risk management techniques could have mitigated the risk in this case:

  1. Clear Boundaries and Policies: Having clear policies on social media interaction and communication channels prevents misunderstandings and ensures adherence to regulations.
  2. Regular Supervision and Training: Regular supervision and training can highlight ethical guidelines, recognize red flags, and emphasize proper intervention techniques.
  3. Effective Risk Assessment: Identifying potential risks through regular client assessments and implementing strategies to address them could have helped detect and manage Mr. Lainez’s suicide risk.

Impact of Risk Management Techniques:

Implementing these techniques could have led to a different outcome:

  • Early Intervention: Recognizing Mr. Lainez’s distress through proper assessment and communication channels could have led to timely intervention and suicide prevention measures.
  • Limited Legal Risk: Adhering to ethical codes and regulations would have minimized legal and disciplinary repercussions for Mr. Ashford.
  • Improved Client Safety: A robust risk management system would prioritize client safety and well-being, enhancing overall service quality.

Conclusion:

This case study highlights the importance of professional boundaries, adherence to ethical codes, and proper risk management procedures in human services. Mr. Ashford’s actions demonstrate the potential consequences of neglecting these crucial aspects. Implementing clear policies, training, and effective risk assessment practices can significantly improve client safety, prevent tragic outcomes, and protect professionals from legal repercussions.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer