Is changing the organization’s domain a feasible strategy for coping with a threatening environment
How do you think planning in today’s organizations compares to planning in an organization 25 years ago? Do you think planning becomes more important or less important in a world where everything quickly changes and crises are a regular part of organizational life? Why?
Is changing the organization’s domain a feasible strategy for coping with a threatening environment? Can you think of an organization in the recent news that has changed its domain? Explain.
Compare the descriptions of the transnational model described in Chapter 6 to the elements of the learning organization described in Chapter 1. Do you think the transnational model would work in a huge global firm?
How can/should a biblical worldview be applied?
Sample Answer
Planning in Today’s Organizations vs. 25 Years Ago:
Differences:
- Pace of Change: Today’s organizations face a much faster pace of change due to globalization, technological advancements, and economic volatility. This necessitates more flexible and adaptable planning compared to the traditional, rigid plans of the past.
- Focus: Planning has shifted from long-term, strategic planning to a combination of strategic and tactical planning. Short-term agility and responsiveness are crucial in today’s dynamic environment.
- Technology: Technology plays a larger role in planning, enabling tools for data analysis, scenario planning, and real-time adjustments.