Full Answer Section

Cons of co-mediation:

• Increased cost: Having two mediators can be more expensive than having one mediator.
• Potential for conflict: Two mediators may have different styles or approaches, which can lead to conflict.
• Confusion for the parties: The parties may be confused about who to listen to or who is in charge.
• Slower pace: Having two mediators can slow down the pace of the mediation, especially if they are not well-coordinated.

Overall, the decision of whether or not to use co-mediation is a case-by-case decision. There are both pros and cons to consider, and the best decision will depend on the specific circumstances of the case.

Here are some additional factors to consider when deciding whether or not to use co-mediation:

• The complexity of the case
• The personalities of the parties involved
• The amount of money at stake
• The mediator’s experience with co-mediation